- From: Shannon <shannon@arc.net.au>
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:39:17 +1100
>>> Again, a false presumption. This was discussed in the context of the >>> HTML WG at the W3C. Those doors are not closed. >>> >> Really? Does that mean I can claim a seat on the board? Where is this discussion about a public standard made public if >> not here? Please provide a link to these open discussions and I'll concede your point (and join - it is public, and free >> right?) >> Ok so I found the other list (public-html at w3c.org). Nokia state their reasons and clearly it was discussed (at Cambridge apparently) but why two lists for one standard? Shannon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20071215/f00e936d/attachment.htm>
Received on Friday, 14 December 2007 11:39:17 UTC