- From: Joseph Daniel Zukiger <joseph_daniel_zukiger@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:02:28 -0800 (PST)
> [...]
> Objectors claim they are working towards a
> resolution that defines a
> MUST video format and is accepted by 'all parties'.
> I don't believe that
> because they know this is impossible and it WILL
> affect HTML5 adoption.
How could a required video format be a step forward?
Unless it is iron-clad guaranteed by some authority
with greater legal competence than legislatures and
courts to be free from any patent taint at all?
> There is no format that can satisfy their
> unreasonable expectations.
> There never will be. We live in a world where
> companies claim patents on
> 'double-clicking' and 'moving pictures on a screen'.
> How then can any
> format ever meet their demands?
> [...]
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
Received on Friday, 14 December 2007 06:02:28 UTC