- From: Jeff McAdams <jeffm@iglou.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:12:43 -0500
Stijn Peeters wrote:
> Changing the SHOULD to MUST means that a lot of browser
> vendors would not be able to develop a conforming implementation.
Again, this needs to be called out as being patently untrue.
They might *choose* not to develop a conforming implemention, but they
certainly are *able* to.
--
Jeff McAdams
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20071214/769e329d/attachment.pgp>
Received on Friday, 14 December 2007 05:12:43 UTC