- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:53:05 +0000
On 13 Dec 2007, at 21:29, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote: >> It would make no sense to require a different baseline audio codec >> for the non-sfx use case for <audio> than was required for <video>.) > > Of course it would make sense. People use their Web pages to put up > music all > the time, much more often than for sound FX. They aren't gonna > upload files > tens of megabytes in size for each song! Huh? I think you've misunderstood what you're quoting, i.e., there will be two audio codecs supported for <audio>: - PCM in WAVE. - Whatever is chosen for <video>. -- Geoffrey Sneddon <http://gsnedders.com/>
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2007 13:53:05 UTC