[whatwg] Removal of Ogg is *preposterous*

• From: Krzysztof Żelechowski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
• Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:58:29 +0100
• Message-ID: <1197503909.7016.135.camel@a1dmin.vola.spe.com.pl>

Dnia 12-12-2007, ?r o godzinie 00:21 -0500, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
pisze:
> Look, guys.  I don't think I've explained myself well, partly because I've 
> come on too strong.  There is no evidence of malice.  There's also no 
> evidence of profiteering.  There *is* evidence of immorality, if you define 
> spreading falsehoods as immoral (see "Ogg is proprietary" comment).  The rest 
> of the discussion is basically a disagreement on how risky it would be to 
> implement Ogg on browsers.  Some of us don't feel it's risky, others feel 
> it's too risky to even consider (I understand -- billions of dollars may be 
> at stake).

And both threads are pointless and irrelevant.

Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 15:58:29 UTC