- From: Manuel Amador <rudd-o@rudd-o.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:20:14 -0500
> A decision was made to have the text reflect the facts that (a) > no-one is happy with a 'should' and (b) that work is ongoing to find > a solution (which might be Ogg, or something else). That's all. I may not be a W3C chair, but I'm pretty sure that if I disagree, then using "no-one" in your sentence is a lie. And I'm not the only one. > >Listen to what the people are saying. > > Oh, I am listening. It's by no means clear that the Ogg crowd is at > all. I'm also spending efforts working on finding a solution. I > don't count lamenting "I want my ogg" on this list as spending > efforts at all. That's because you already found your solution: H.264. Except that it's not an option. Face it, "spending efforts on finding a solution" is a red herring, because if any codec was both good and patent-unencumbered (besides the Ogg technology family, of course): - you'd already heard about it - you could still wave your hands and say "nooooooo, it might be torpedoed by a submarine patent" It's just stalling. -- Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o at rudd-o.com> Rudd-O.com - http://rudd-o.com/ GPG key ID 0xC8D28B92 at http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ It usually takes more than three weeks to prepare a good impromptu speech. -- Mark Twain -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20071211/3ae3247b/attachment.pgp>
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 16:20:14 UTC