W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2007

[whatwg] Removal of Ogg is *preposterous*

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:55:38 +0100
Message-ID: <op.t26u20nnwxe0ny@pc078.coreteam.oslo.opera.com>
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:14:50 +0100, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)  
<rudd-o at rudd-o.com> wrote:

> Chris Double.  That's the guy who concocted Theora support into the  
> video tag.

Opera demonstrated Ogg in HTML and SVG about a year ago too - it isn't  
new. We haven't yet put out more than experimental builds, but it can  
certainly be done - and with SVG you can get all kinds of nice demos. Have  
a look at http://labs.opera.com for our more recent work...

We're disappointed to see the spec go in this direction. I think it is a  
backward step.

There is no voting in WHAT-WG, and there is not much in W3C, but there is  
a reasonable process there that hopefully allows for this stuff to go back  
into the specification, unless we find a better alternative (i.e. still  
free). Let's keep hoping.



Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle fran?ais -- hablo espa?ol -- jeg l?rer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals   Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 12:55:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:59 UTC