W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2007

[whatwg] Removal of Ogg is *preposterous*

From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:11:57 +0000
Message-ID: <9BA5EC20-A49A-4B71-A44F-B3CADD7BC555@googlemail.com>

On 11 Dec 2007, at 13:36, Maik Merten wrote:

> The old wording was a SHOULD requirement. No MUST. If the big  
> players don't want to take the perceived risk (their decision)  
> they'd still be 100% within the spec. Thus I fail to see why there  
> was need for action.

There's a question within the W3C Process whether patents that are  
covered by a SHOULD via a reference are granted a RF license similarly  
to anything that MUST be implemented. Both Nokia and MS raised  
concerns about this relating to publishing the spec as a FPWD.

Geoffrey Sneddon
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 08:11:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:59 UTC