- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:04:51 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Colin Lieberman wrote:
> Matthew Raymond wrote:
> >
> > I support the <time> element for the opposite reason, in fact. I don't
> > want to see authors styling the date format. I'd rather see the date
> > format localized or customized to a user preference. If the author
> > wants it in a specific format, they can use CSS to style the element
> > in such a way as to show its contents:
> >
> > HTML:
> > | <time datetime="YYYY-MM-DD">(*)???MMMM;YY;D???(*)</time>
> >
> > CSS (using css3-content):
> > | time { content: contents; }
>
> I agree to a point. Time and date should be machine readable in markup,
> but I don't know if UAs should *default* to user preference over-riding
> the author's chosen format.
>
> My argument here is cultural or sociological - If, in 10 years, kids
> grew up only ever seeing dates presented in one format, they wouldn't
> learn about how dates work elsewhere. This seems like a small thing, but
> I think the flavor of dealing with varieties of date formats is just one
> way that we get to participate in a really cool, big world full of lots
> of different people.
I think it is highly unlikely that <time> would be so successful as to
hide all other date formats from users. Would we only be so lucky!
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 02:04:51 UTC