W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2007

[whatwg] (no subject)

From: Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:47:33 +0200
Message-ID: <000201c7e982$68133ce0$4d01010a@IBM42F76C011DF>
I think arithmetic notation for dates B.C. is unintuitive and hard to
understand (also because in terms of dates -1+1=1).  It would be better to
present a B.C. check box, or just say it aloud if dates A.D. are not



-----Original Message-----
From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Rikkert Koppes
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 10:39 AM
To: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org
Subject: [whatwg] (no subject)



- are negative years allowed (B.C.)? the datetime description tells me "four
or more digits (0 to 9) representing the year" which implies "no". use case:
hystory questionary

Rikkert Koppes

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070828/10d535e0/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2007 07:47:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:57 UTC