- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:10:56 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > > > > > > So where this context menu feature request comes from? > > > > It's a frequent request from Web app developers. > > Do you have any links for them? Not off-hand. You can probably find them in the archives. > > I gave two earlier; Google Docs and Spreadsheets is another. Context > > menus that are "non-styleable" are used in almost all desktop > > applications, so any Web analogue to desktop applications could well > > want to use one. We frequently get requests for how to do this. > > Question was: "Do you have any examples of exisiting web applications > that will benefit *significantly* from having that flat puristic context > menus?" I posit that the examples I gave are applications that would benefit significantly. We may disagree on what is significant, of course, that is subjective. > Google Maps uses two types of context menus/panels: > http://www.terrainformatica.com/w3/gmap.jpg The top one in that picture is not a context menu. > So you say that if one of it will be implemented as <select type="menu"> > then this will significantly improve quality of this application or > solve many problems. Sounds a bit artificial, isn't it? Implementing the bottom as a <menu type="context"> would significantly improve the user experience, yes. > And here is an example of menu used in Google Spreadsheet > http://www.terrainformatica.com/w3/gcalc.jpg > > So you say that Google Spreadsheet will use that plain text menus? Again, we are talking about context menus here, not about drop-down menus. I agree that drop-down menus and menu buttons are not addressed by the current draft, and I imagine we'll address those in a future version. > And where these 80% came from? If three applications you provided will > not benefit from proposed solution? I disagree with the premise of your question. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 01:10:56 UTC