W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2007

[whatwg] details == footnote ?

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 06:41:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708040640480.9753@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Elliotte Harold wrote:
>
> Is the details element a generalization of footnotes/endnotes? For 
> instance would it be appropriate to render a details element as a 
> footnote or endnote? Would it be appropriate to encode a footnote or 
> endnote as a details element in which the footnote marker was the 
> legend?

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> 
> My understanding is that its purpose is to mark up parts of application 
> UI that are behind a disclosure triangle.
> 
> Footnotes, on the other hand, are visible by default.

Henri's understanding is what I originally intended. Is there something in 
the spec that suggests otherwise? Should I explicitly say that footnotes 
and endnotes shouldn't be marked up using <details>?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 23:41:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:36 UTC