- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 01:24:17 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Shadow2531 wrote: > > I might seem picky, but I don't really like how loop() takes a > *playcount* param. > > loop() = infinite > loop(1) = play once > loop(2) = play twice > > It's the loop(n) that bugs me. I see loop(1) and think that the file is > going to play once and then loop once. (The first time it plays is not a > looped play.) > > Luckily, I saw the spec and read that the parameter is NOT how many > times to loop, but how many times to play, hence *playcount*. The spec has changed (we no longer have loop() itself); is the new API ok in your opinion? Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 18:24:17 UTC