- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:16:59 +0200
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:32:57 +0200, ddailey <ddailey at zoominternet.net> wrote: > Makes sense to me. If such a thing is not already spoken for why not aim > toward a little consistency with pre-existing implementations, like in > SVG, where it would be repeatCount="indefinite"? > > Not my favorite piece of nomenclature ever, but it's out there and has a > user-base already. Given that language is already spelled wrong remarkably often introducing indefinite as attribute value might not be a good idea. Besides that, the WHATWG specification already breaks with the SMIL model so just copying some bits doesn't seem like a good justification for consistency. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 23 April 2007 23:16:59 UTC