- From: Michael A. Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 04:42:58 -0400
On 4/12/07, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen at iki.fi> wrote: > On Apr 12, 2007, at 01:45, Michael A. Puls II wrote: > > > On 4/11/07, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen at iki.fi> wrote: > >> I was thinking of > >> establishing an attribute such as "script-private" where authors > >> would be free to stick anything for retrieval by scripts. > > > > What would happen with <embed script-private="something">? Would the > > data be passed to the plug-in as a script-private param or would > > script-private be reserved; causing any plug-in using script-param not > > to get the data? (A prefix could possible avoid this.) > > In old browsers at least, the script-private="something" would be > passed to the plug-in. Is it a problem? Potentially. If the plug-in requires a script-private param for something, that'd mean you might not be able to use script-private on the embed element for what you want. In that case, you would use a different attribute name that doesn't conflict, which is O.K. because you can use use some odd attribute on embed and still validate. It's not a big concern, but IF there's a way to avoid that potential conflict, it'd be cool. -- Michael
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 01:42:58 UTC