- From: Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:27:22 +0100
In message <op.tqc4hdnd6iodd8 at tzeentch.studby.ntnu.no>, Magnus Kristiansen <magnusrk+whatwg at pvv.org> writes >On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 14:31:58 +0200, Andy Mabbett ><andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: > >> >> How often do we see something like: >> >> <p>Animals:</p> >> <ul> >> <li>Cat</li> >> <li>Dog</li> >> <li>Horse</li> >> <li>Cow</li> >> </ul> >> >> This would be more meaningful as: >> >> <ul caption="Animals"> >> <li>Cat</li> >> <li>Dog</li> >> <li>Horse</li> >> <li>Cow</li> >> </ul> >> >> There could also be a summary attribute, as with tables. >> >> Any interest? > >We should do our best to avoid repeats of alt, title, and friends. Why? >A list header would go much better as a separate element, like ><caption> is for tables. Like: <ul> <caption>Animals</caption> (or lh, or whatever) <li>Cat</li> <li>Dog</li> <li>Horse</li> <li>Cow</li> </ul> Yes, that would work, too. >The resurrection of <lh> was proposed a few days ago on this very >list, why not take a look at that thread? Great minds think alike! ;-) -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
Received on Friday, 6 April 2007 07:27:22 UTC