- From: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:36:34 +0200
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:16:11 +0200, Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.com> wrote: > Following the discussion about the limitations of <dialog>, I meditated > about it a little and came up with the idea to generalize things a > little more. > > When we have a dialog intermixed with actions and other events (like > "ABC leaves the chat room"), basically we have a sequential list of > events, actions and spoken parts. And in my later example, the Canadian > Parliament hansard, they're intermixed with timestamps at regular > intervals and other notes regarding live translations. Again, this fits > very well the concept of a list of different kinds of intermixed > sequential events. > > So I propose a <sl> element (sequential list) which can be used to > replace <dialog> as well as other things. The proposal can be found here: > > <http://www.michelf.com/documents/whatwg/timeline/> I get a 404 for this URI. > Basically, <dt> and <dd> work just like they do in <dialog> currently, > except that you can have more than one <dd> following a <dt>. <li> is > used for listing events other than speech and <time> is used to insert > time marks where appropriate. And you don't need to have any spoken > part, meaning you can use it for system logs, or historical timelines > too by using only <li> and <time>. It seems to me like a sequential list with only <li> and <time> seems very much like <ol>, so why not use <ol> for such cases? Authors have hard enough time to choose between the various abstract list elements already, let's not introduce more of them. :-) -- Simon Pieters
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 07:36:34 UTC