- From: Tim Connor <timocratic@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:12:28 -0700
Ya, it was fast and ugly - more pseudo mark-up to highlight the questions than anything. Of course, this is how things are *currently* marked up in these situations - it's the only logical way. What I am driving at (very poorly, apparently, so you have my apologies) is that some of us lowly authors DO want some sanctioned way to associate those headers. That's all I am asking. I know how to work with what exists. I also just happen to know that hierarchies best represented by nested lists are not that uncommon in creating web content. Yes, you can make an argument for using hn the whole way through (and those of us that nit-pick how we should most semantically mark-up our content, do debate that), instead of nesting lists, but that seems better suited to when it's at a whole document level, rather than a list within a document. That also makes an outline with indentation (not to mention a true menu) a total pain, and requires a bunch of unnecessary additional css work (the addition of pointless classes, or a bunch of sibling selector work). After all, why else do we have the ability to make nested lists. Can we please have SOME method of strictly, explicitly semantically associating headings within lists. Wether it's bringing back a deprecated element, or defining li/lu/ol as sectioning elements, or some other way, I don't really care. I'm okay with the current usage of a hn within a list - heck, we're all pretty practiced at styling that by now ;). I'm just confirming that there is no specified semantic tie, currently, and asking if that is set in stone. Basically, if we don't have <lh>, then why shouldn't headings as sectioning/outlining tools be allowed in lists? Am I just being stupid, and missing something? Thanks, Tim
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2007 13:12:28 UTC