- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 16:07:04 +0200
The semantic of the DEFER attribute is already specified. You may complain about it of course but it has nothing to do with my suggestion. I only think it should apply to embedded scripts as well, which is IMHO completely independent of the semantic. Browser incompatibilities are not an issue in a restricted environment where I can impose requirements on the browsers supported; I just do not want the validator to complain about my DEFER. You can have it one way or the other - but do not make it harder than it needs to be, which means the current prerequisite SRC for DEFER should be discarded. Chris -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Hallvord R M Steen Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 3:48 PM To: Kristof Zelechovski Cc: whatwg at whatwg.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] Apply script.defer to internal scripts On 27/03/07, Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl> wrote: > 3.17.1. The script element specification says: > > defer (if the src attribute is present) > > async (if the src attribute is present) > I understand that the async attribute must depend on the src attribute > because it is needed and meaningful only when the script element is loaded > from an external source; however, the advantage of using the defer attribute > is not limited to that case. There is no real advantage to the defer attribute since in HTML4 it is only advisory, the UA is not required to actually defer the script execution, and some implementations only defer it until seeing the next SCRIPT element in the source. Relying on it the way your use case does will work in very few browsers, and specifying this in HTML5 would increase backwards incompatibility for a very minimal gain. -- Hallvord R. M. Steen
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2007 07:07:04 UTC