- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:44:27 +0200
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:51:53 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren forwarded this from Shane McCarron: >> XHTML2 will be using the same namespace as XHTML1, and there will not be >> two modules. > > This has been an "issue" in the XHTML2 draft for some time: > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/conformance.html#s_conform_issue_4 Yeah, I noticed that. I just thought that was there to please someone as it doesn't really seem like an option, as you point in your reply to Lachlan... Oh well, should be fun! > I would be more concerned about how they are intending on making > XHTML2 compatible with XHTML1 than with the WHATWG work. For example, > XHTML2's <input> element has basically completely different semantics > than XHTML1's. Even simple elements like <img> and <q> are > incompatible across the two versions, in the current draft. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 08:44:27 UTC