On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:24:08 +0600, Channy Yun <channy at creation.net> wrote: > As I said in other thread, I think digital signature must be > standardized for secure and legal assurance of form data and I respect > your issuing and great jobs. But, we can simply think this issue in > range of this group. Most of forms directly go to web server via > urlencoded. If some indicators are given, browsers can execute signing > process. > > For example, > > <form name="sendmoney" action="/send.cgi" signed="signed"> > <input type="text" name="dollars" value="3.00"> > <input type="text" name="account" values="1234567890"> > <input type="submt" value="Sending Money!"> > </form> What benefit does this provide over simply using HTTPS with a client-side certificate? -- Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru> [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.comReceived on Tuesday, 31 October 2006 20:57:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:49 UTC