- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:56:19 +0200
On Oct 29, 2006, at 19:16, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > So what comes out will probably be a (perhaps evolved) version of > WHATWG stuff, as has been the case in some other W3C groups already. That would be excellent. Perhaps I was overly worried, because I couldn't tell from the announcement where this is going. >>> Or will the WHAT WG activities continue with an endorsement from >>> the W3C? > > I would be very surprised. As Tim notes, the WHATWG doesn't have > what he calls "accountability measures" (by which I think he means > a process with more of the checks and balances that are found in > W3C's), which would make it hard for W3C to endorse anything WHATWG > have yet to do. I don't expect the W3C to endorse the WHAT WG itself. What I meant to ask if the WHAT WG spec drafts continue to be worked on under the banner of the W3C. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 30 October 2006 01:56:19 UTC