- From: Joao Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:08:52 +0100
Na , Brad Fults <bfults at gmail.com> escreveu: > On 10/3/06, Joao Eiras <joao.eiras at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Although WebForm2 provides automatic validation of form content from the >> UA side, the specification has a few gaps related to customizablility of >> notifications, by web authors, without scripting enabled. >> >> If the user fills a form in an improper way the UA should alert him of >> the >> problems. Opera in the early days of its initial web forms support >> showed >> an alert box stating that the information was invalid, now it flashes >> the >> input field, and presents a message overlapped in the webpage. >> However it presents a very generic error message like "You must set a >> value!" (for required) or "foo is not in the format this page requires" >> (for pattern). >> The author may want, in the case of an error, to present its custom >> error >> message to the end user. >> This could be achieved by declaring new custom attribute for the several >> controls, which could hold the message. The UA could then either pop up >> that message to the user or embed it in the page (like Opera does >> currently). >> The attribute could be named like requirederr, patternerr, or use some >> other sort of naming convention to easily associate the constraining >> property with the message attribute. > > Is the use of the title attribute inappropriate for this case? > I believe title is used for a berief description, not for error messages, besides a control may not validate for more than one reason.
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2006 20:08:52 UTC