- From: David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 01:19:04 +0100
(Accidently only sent the first mail to Andrew). On 12/1/06, Andrew Fedoniouk <news at terrainformatica.com> wrote: > While we are on the subject of discussing HTML syntax.... > > How about following (wild) idea? > > To allow following notation (borrowed from CSS selectors): > > <p.myclass>...</p> is equivalent of > <p class="myclass">...</p> > > <p#myid>...</p> is equivalent of > <p id="myid">...</p> > > <p.myclass1.myclass2>...</p> is equivalent of > <p class="myclass1 myclass2">...</p> > > <p#myid.myclass1.myclass2>...</p> is equivalent of > <p id="myid" class="myclass1 myclass2">...</p> > > It is syntax sugar of course but at least it will reduce amount of data > needs to be sent over the wire. HTML5 is meant to be backwards compatible, so this is out of the question. -- David H?s?ther
Received on Thursday, 30 November 2006 16:19:04 UTC