- From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:25:39 -0500
Hi, I think it would be enlightening for WHAT-WG members to explain future developments in autodiscovery on http://feedautodiscovery.org/ taking care to delineate future capabilities and standards from the stuff that works right now. It might also help to give the WHAT-WG elevator pitch. It's a wiki, so edit and link as you like. - Rob ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Date: Nov 29, 2006 5:45 PM Subject: WikiWikiWeb (was: Autodiscovery Draft Issues) To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> Cc: atom-syntax <atom-syntax at imc.org>, rss-public at yahoogroups.com On 11/29/06, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote: > > James M Snell wrote: > > To document best practice as it relates specifically to syndication > > feeds. > > It's not entirely clear what that actually means. How would it be any > different from, or more useful than, existing documentation on the > subject that has been around for the past 3 or 4 years. Well, it would be much less useful, since IETF documents don't have pictures or unicode or translations. With encouragement from the RSS-Public mailing list, I've taken their Creative-Commons spec and pubilshed it here: http://feedautodiscovery.org/ I removed the RFC 2119 reference, since I was told they were giving "advice", and using SHOULD for it, which doesn't jive with the 2119 definitions. Now, the Atom list should jump in and update the document so it does justice to both formats. It's a wiki... just go for it. (the CSS is a little rough still... I'll work on prettying it up) -- Robert Sayre -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 16:25:39 UTC