- From: Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:35:15 -0500
>> I've chosen an inline-level content model because it allows not only >> img, but also structured inline-level elements like pre. I'm not so >> sure about that choice however. > > Hm, <pre> seems like an interesting thing to put in a <figure>[...] I > certainly could see us also allowing <figure> to label <pre><samp> and > <pre><code>. This seems like a potentially very natural way to convert RFC2629bis' <figure> & <artwork> elements into HTML5. Ted -- Edward O'Connor hober0 at gmail.com Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.
Received on Monday, 27 November 2006 21:35:15 UTC