[whatwg] noscript Content Model

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>> So, given that it already states the conforming content model is the 
>> same as that of its parent element, I don't see how that is an 
>> additional restriction at all.
> 
> Consider:
> 
>    <aside>
>      <noscript>
>        <em>Text</em>
>      </noscript>
>      <noscript>
>        <p>Text</p>
>      </noscript>
>    </aside>

I see.  How about including that example in the spec and rephrasing 
first additional requirement like this:

* Replacing each noscript element with its child elements must not
   cause the document to become non-conforming.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/