- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:51:42 +0200
On Nov 9, 2006, at 14:38, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Henri Sivonen wrote: >> On Oct 23, 2006, at 21:31, Ian Hickson wrote: >>> I don't know whether we'll keep the requirement that TFOOTs be above >>> TBODYs. >> Do you mean moving all TFOOTs after TBODYs, so that the HTML 4.01 >> placement would be forbidden? > > No, I think tfoot should be allowed either before or after tbodys, > but not between them. I don't have strong feelings about whether tfoot should be allowed before, after or either before or after tbodys. >> , ( ( thead.elem?, tfoot.elem?, tbody.elem+ ) > > I think that should be changed to this > > ( thead.elem?, tfoot.elem? & tbody.elem+ ) That doesn't look right to me. I think you meant this: ( thead.elem?, ( ( tfoot.elem?, tbody.elem+ ) | ( tbody.elem+, tfoot.elem? ) ) ) -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 05:51:42 UTC