W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2006

[whatwg] Table integrity and conformance

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:51:42 +0200
Message-ID: <B3B85500-025E-40E1-98B0-B66CD33510A5@iki.fi>
On Nov 9, 2006, at 14:38, Lachlan Hunt wrote:

> Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> On Oct 23, 2006, at 21:31, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> I don't know whether we'll keep the requirement that TFOOTs be above
>>> TBODYs.
>> Do you mean moving all TFOOTs after TBODYs, so that the HTML 4.01  
>> placement would be forbidden?
>
> No, I think tfoot should be allowed either before or after tbodys,  
> but not between them.

I don't have strong feelings about whether tfoot should be allowed  
before, after or either before or after tbodys.

>>         ,    (    ( thead.elem?, tfoot.elem?, tbody.elem+ )
>
> I think that should be changed to this
>
> ( thead.elem?, tfoot.elem? & tbody.elem+ )

That doesn't look right to me. I think you meant this:
( thead.elem?, (  ( tfoot.elem?, tbody.elem+ ) | ( tbody.elem+,  
tfoot.elem? ) ) )

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 05:51:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:30 UTC