- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:37:01 +0200
On Nov 6, 2006, at 07:34, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >> Is there a reason why the definition of space characters does not >> match >> the XML 1.0 and RELAX NG definition of white space (space, tab, >> CR, LF) >> but also includes (line tabulation and form feed)? Is the >> deviation from >> XML 1.0 needed for backwards compatibility with text/html UAs? > > I made the parser consider VT and FF as being whitespace based on, > as I > recall, a complete examination of every Unicode character's > behaviour in > the parsers I was testing. The definition of "space characters" > matches > the parser's behaviour for consistency. > > The definition of "space characters" doesn't affect the XML parser > stage > as far as I can recall, only attribute parsing and DOM conformance. The potential problem with it affecting DOM conformance is that it may have ripple effects to running XML tooling inside a browser engine. Gecko has an XPath implementation. Disruptive Innovations has created a RELAX NG implementation for Gecko. Running the schemas from syntax.whattf.org on a DOM inside Gecko would be interesting, since it would allow checking DOM snapshots modified by scripts. There may be other reasons to run XML machinery on an HTML DOM in a browser. Both XPath and RELAX NG assume that white space-separated tokens follow the XML notion of white space. Not being able to use the native XPath and RELAX NG notions of splitting on white space would be seriously uncool. Of course, a browser engine might get away with tampering with the XPath or RELAX NG notions of white space since the additional characters don't occur in XML. But does it make sense to inflict the cost of such tweaking on the XML parts of browser engines? Would there be serious compatibility problems if the HTML5 parsing algorithm required VT and FF to be mapped to space (after expanding NCRs) and the higher-level parts of the spec defined white space as space, tab, CR and LF? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 6 November 2006 02:37:01 UTC