- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 12:31:58 +0000
Elliotte Harold wrote: > I suspect there are actually two axes here, and they're not orthogonal, [...] > I agree we don't want to go all the way to 1 on the first axis. [...] > However, I would turn the second axis all the way to about 0.99 Just to note that, in your model of non-orthogonal axes, you can't adjust the values independently like this. Moreover, your model of the axes being number of semantic elements and fraction of semantic elements doesn't work terribly well -- consider Matthew's point about the existence of <i> and <b> increasing the utility of <em> and <strong>. -- "The universe doesn't care what you believe. The wonderful thing about science is that it doesn't ask for your faith, it just asks for your eyes" --- http://xkcd.com/c154.html
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 04:31:58 UTC