- From: Matthew Paul Thomas <mpt@myrealbox.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 05:00:22 -0800
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Christoph P?per wrote: > > The second to last example should probably better read: > > <var>E</var> = <var>m</var> ? <var>c<var><sup>2</sup> > > or maybe, as the speed of light is a constant, > > <var>E</var> = <var>m</var> ? c<sup>2</sup>. > ... Is that equation ever legitimately rendered (in physics textbooks etc) with the "m" in a different style from the "c"? If not, perhaps the definition of <var> needs to be expanded to include physical constants. -- Matthew Paul Thomas http://mpt.net.nz/
Received on Saturday, 4 November 2006 05:00:22 UTC