- From: Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:42:15 -0800
Hello Christoph, On 11/1/06, Christoph P?per <christoph.paeper at crissov.de> wrote: > > *Henri Sivonen*, 2006-10-29: > > >> http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/ > > > >> * HTML has samp, var, and kbd. I use all of them and I am > >> pretty much the only one who does. > > > > FWIW, I think <samp> and <kbd> don't deserve to be in HTML and I am > > not convinced that the use cases for <var> could not be satisfied > > by <i>. > > I consider > > <a href="foo.xga"><samp><img src="foo.qvga" alt="Foo"></samp></a> That's a really good idea! more semantic than the frequent > > <a href="foo.xga"><img src="foo.qvga" class="thumbnail" > alt="Foo"></a>. > > Alas nobody is using it that way. (What kind of |rel| could one use > for this kind of links BTW?) > See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20061101/d84a3588/attachment.htm>
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 11:42:15 UTC