W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2006

[whatwg] Browser Signature Standards Proposal

From: Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:29:26 +0600
Message-ID: <op.tibwjcwb1h6og4@feldgendler.plesk.ru>
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:22:15 +0600, Channy Yun <channy at gmail.com> wrote:

>> What benefit does this provide over simply using HTTPS with a client-side
>> certificate?

> Using HTTPS with a client-side certificate doesn't support digital
> signature.The digital signature is same with the signing or stamp of
> contract in real world. Many governments encourage to add digital
> signature to transactional data (form data). It legally assures data
> and transactions signed(added digital signature) by user's
> certificates.

The purpose of a digital signature is to certify that the data submitted by the client were not forged by an attacker. HTTPS with a client-side certificate ensures the same.

Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru>
[ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 00:29:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:49 UTC