- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:16:30 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, dolphinling wrote: > > I think I agree with Sjoerd here. Changing canvas to be applied to the > img/object elements instead of its own element would be much more > semantic, and would also provide better fallback. Unfortunately, we are constrained by previous implementation work here (and we were even when the issue was originally raised, sorry for taking so long to answer it). However, even if we weren't, IMHO it makes good sense to use different elements for different things. If the overloading of <object> has taught us anything, it's that putting multiple features on one element leads to massive interoperability failures. It has taken years to get <object> anywhere near usable, and it still isn't fully usable in all implementations. Adding yet more features to it is not a good plan, IMHO. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 04:16:30 UTC