- From: Michel Fortin <michel.fortin@michelf.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:19:12 -0400
I wrote previously: > Well, I'm all for using <caption> -- it obviously is the most > logical choice -- but, as stated in my first reply, the caption > element is completely ignored by today's HTML parsers when outside > the context of a table. This makes captions impossible to style or > use within the DOM. That's why I'm suggesting an alternative that > doesn't involve the caption element. I'd like to revise what I said. I just found out that at least one important HTML parser (Gecko) doesn't create the right DOM tree out of something as simple as this: <section> <p>Some paragraph</p> </section> The tree will be as if you wrote this: <section> </section><p>Some paragraph</p> Why? Because unknown elements are considered inline and won't accept any block element within. This problem applies to <nav>, <header>, <footer>, and <aside> too (and maybe others). The point I want to make is that because simple elements like section aren't really backward-compatible, there is probably no point in requiring that from image captions either. Hence it could be acceptable to allow the following markup even if current HTML parsers are ignoring caption: <figure> <caption>Some image</caption> <img src="..."> </figure> So here is what I'm proposing: - - - The figure element Block-level element, and structured inline-level element. Contexts in which this element may be used: Where block-level elements are expected. Where structured inline-level elements are allowed. Content model: Zero or one caption element followed by inline-level content. The figure element contains an illustration of something related to the content surrounding it, but which can be considered separate from that content. - - - I've chosen an inline-level content model because it allows not only img, but also structured inline-level elements like pre. I'm not so sure about that choice however. Michel Fortin michel.fortin at michelf.com http://www.michelf.com/
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2006 06:19:12 UTC