W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2006

[whatwg] JSONRequest

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:03:04 +1000
Message-ID: <442B6688.60204@lachy.id.au>
Douglas Crockford wrote:
>> If application/json isn't acceptable (though I don't know why it 
>> wouldn't be), then try a hyphen instead: application/json-request
> 
> The issue is to provide a way of identifying JSONRequest transactions 
> that cannot be confused with legacy applications.

To me, this just feels like misuse of the MIME type.  It should describe 
the content type of the message body, not the protocol/method used to 
access it.  Maybe a parameter could be used instead.

i.e.  application/json;param=value

Though, as I'm still not exactly sure what the new MIME type idea is 
supposed to express, I've got no idea what the parameter could be called.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2006 21:03:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:45 UTC