W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2006

[whatwg] <progress> draft

From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:22:43 +0100
Message-ID: <4429A923.1010205@cam.ac.uk>
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, James Graham wrote:
>> +1
>> This seems to be a case where "there should be one, and preferably 
>> only one, obvious way to do it" holds.
> 
> Well, there are two ways -- update the textContent, and update the 
> attribute. But for the attribute, there's only one syntax. We could remove 
> the attribute as well, and force authors to use textContent, though...

AFAICT, the design without a value attribute rocks. If only the whole 
spec could make fallbak content such an integral part of the design...
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2006 13:22:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:45 UTC