- From: Michael 'Ratt' Iannarelli <mcratt@itctel.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:27:18 -0600
Greetings, Henri Sivonen wrote: > It isn't redundant when they are not the same thing. They are not the > same thing here. > > Have you read mpt's earlier posts on the topic? > http://listserver.dreamhost.com/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2004-September/002211.html Yes, I have read mpt's (and others') posts on this topic. I still feel the progress element is redundant. <meter min="0" value="0.45" max="1"></meter> represents some value that is 45 percent of the whole. A graphical user agent is going to display a bar of some length with 45 percent of that bar highlighted in some fashion. It is otherwise meaningless without a label. Disk Quota: <meter min="0" value="0.45" max="1"></meter> Cloud Cover: <meter min="0" value="0.45" max="1"></meter> Download Progress: <meter min="0" value="0.45" max="1"></meter> The only difference between meter and progress is the potential for progress to be dynamic. The "how" progress will be dynamic has yet to be defined in the spec. If the method turns out to be as simple as setting an attribute task="someTask" then <meter task="someTask"> </meter> could direct the user agent to display a progress-style bar when someTask is initiated. One element to implement as opposed to two. Just my thoughts, Michael 'Ratt' Iannarelli
Received on Saturday, 25 March 2006 05:27:18 UTC