W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2006

[whatwg] <progress> draft

From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:24:49 +0000
Message-ID: <44240F41.9000100@cam.ac.uk>
Simon Pieters wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> From: Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch>
>> What do people think? Is it valuable to be able to do:
>>
>>    <progress value="5%"/>
>>
>> ...instead of either of these:
>>
>>    <progress value="0.05"/>
>>    <progress>5%</progress>
>>
>> ...?
> 
> No, direct relationship to the DOM makes implementation and authoring 
> more straight forward, I think. I don't see much advantage in allowing 
> different formats in the value="".

+1
This seems to be a case where "there should be one, and preferably only 
one, obvious way to do it" holds.

-- 
"In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it 
would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples 
might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal 
time in physics classrooms."

     - Stephen Jay Gould
Received on Friday, 24 March 2006 07:24:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:45 UTC