W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2006

[whatwg] WA1: Conformance requirements

From: Aankhen <aankhen@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:32:10 +0530
Message-ID: <ae697d050603102202g721c2511g8bf5885a723e026a@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/11/06, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> [snip]
> I've reworded the paragraph like this:
>   <p>Some conformance requirements are phrased as requirements on
>   elements, attributes, methods or objects. Such requirements fall
>   into two categories; those describing content model restrictions,
>   and those describing implementatino behaviour.

Minor change: that should probably be a full colon there rather than a

> The former category
> of requirements are requirements on documents and authoring
> tools. The second category are requirements on user agents.</p>

Is there a need to say "of requirements" after "category"?  It seems
unnecessary.  Perhaps this might do:

 "The former category describes requirements on documents and
 authoring tools.  The second describes requirements on user

"Why don't you go on a diet!"
"Because I like to eat!  Is that a crime?"
Received on Friday, 10 March 2006 22:02:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:45 UTC