- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:03:39 -0800
On Thursday 2006-03-09 17:56 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, L. David Baron wrote: > > > > It says: > > > > Conformance requirements phrased as requirements on elements, > > > > attributes, methods or objects are conformance requirements on user > > > > agents. > "The ins and del elements must implement the HTMLModElement interface:" But it's their DOM objects that must implement the HTMLModElement interface, not the elements themselves. > I can't find any examples on attributes, but I could imagine having some. > > I agree that often there are requirements on elements and attributes that > are really requirements on authors. > > I'll have to go through and fix that. Perhaps the way to fix it is to say: # Conformance requirements phrased as requirements on elements or markup # attributes are conformance requirements on documents. # # Conformance requirements phrased as requirements on DOM attributes, # methods, or objects are conformance requirements on user agents. It seems like that would catch more of the common cases. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 191 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20060309/29ab88ed/attachment.pgp>
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2006 10:03:39 UTC