W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2006

[whatwg] image captions

From: Hugh Winkler <hughw@wellstorm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:47:13 -0500
Message-ID: <927441b30606280847v60450075q4713437ef3ba1b74@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/27/06, Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.com> wrote:
> Le 27 juin 2006 ? 6:00, dolphinling a ?crit :
> > What's wrong with
> >
> > <div>
> >   <img src="">
> >   <p>This is the caption.</p>
> > </div>
> >
> > ? That's how I think of it semantically, and I don't see it as
> > being common enough to warrant a separate element of its own.
> The problem is that this means nothing. The paragraph could be the
> caption as much as it could be an the excerpt of an article with a
> small category logo at the top, or it could be an image inserted for
> presentational purpose or something else. There is no way to
> disambiguate any of this with your markup. The fact that they are
> together does not mean that it is a caption, it somewhat convey that
> the two are related, but in what way?

> What's wrong with
> <div>
>    <img src="">
>    <p>This is the caption.</p>
> </div>

How about an anchor with rel="caption":

<a rel="caption" href="#caption1"><img src="x.jpg"/></a>
<span id="caption1">man bites dog</span>


<img id="img1" src="x.jpg"/>
<span id="caption1"><a rel="caption" rev="#img1">man bites dog</caption></span>

The latter has the advantage that you can put another <a> element
around the image (HTML4 prohibits nesting iirc).

This way requires no new elements or attributes, just a new
LinkType[1]. Also if you define other LinkTypes, you could express the
other relationships Michel identified, e.g. you could have a Linktype
for "excerpt of an article with a> small category logo at the top."


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstraction.html#dt_LinkTypes
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 08:47:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:47 UTC