- From: Mihai Sucan <mihai.sucan@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:36:09 +0300
Le Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:42:13 +0300, dolphinling <lists at dolphinling.net> a ?crit: > Mihai Sucan wrote: >> There's nothing "wrong" with that. Yet, that's not exactly an image >> caption. There's no explicit association between the <img> and the >> following <p>. > > But there's the implicit association given by the fact that they're > there, together, in the <div>, and nothing else is. Do you really need > anything more than that? Yes. That's because <div> does not properly serve this purpose. Your suggestion is overusing <div>. Can an aural browser be sure your markup is actually representing an image with its caption? You could also use: <div class="image-caption"> <img /> <p>caption</p> </div> However, this looks like a microformat. Nonetheless, it's better than leaving out the class attribute. -- http://www.robodesign.ro ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 05:36:09 UTC