- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:25:18 +0200
Quoting White Lynx <whitelynx at operamail.com>: > "Web application technologies SHOULD BE BASED ON technologies > authors are familiar with, > including HTML, CSS, DOM, AND JAVASCRIPT" As it would work with that, it's not really a problem. > "Basic Web application features SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTABLE using behaviors, > scripting, and style sheets IN IE6 TODAY" I guess that's possible. > "Any solution that CANNOT BE USED with the current high-market-share user > agent WITHOUT THE NEED FOR BINARY PLUG-INS is highly unlikely to be > successful" ... > "The core features of an XML vocabulary should require the use of elements > from ONLY ONE NAMESPACE." Is math really a core feature? Does it matter if we keep compatibility with existing (deployed) formats in mind? > "IT IS VERY IMPORTANT that authors BE ABLE TO MOVE FROM AN HTML ENVIRONMENT > TO A CLEAN COMPOUND DOCUMENT ENVIRONMENT (typically first simply by > moving to XHTML) IN A GRADUAL FASHION." That seems to be what Ian is proposing (for math), more or less. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Saturday, 17 June 2006 04:25:18 UTC