- From: <juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Juan R. wrote: Therefore official reply from w3c of Microsoft is not interested in math because small number of users is a myth It would read Therefore "official" reply from w3c of Microsoft is not interested in math because small number of users is a myth because was not official in the sense of public manifesto but said in several media and mailing list by some people, including authors from the w3c. I presented here links to MathML test suites are passed by George CSS technique but are not passed by browser with native MathML support (Firefox 1.0). Would i provide snapshoots of that my native MathML browser is able to render and that he would render? I also have heard that CSS cannot provide rendering quality of MathML but never see a serious study on that (just personal beliefs). I find curious that even MathML authors recognize the need to substitute p-MathML capabilities by CSS (this already was done in 2nd version of MathML) look one of MathML guys said. However, here some people claim that CSS is not great enough. I would be glad to do an experiment on this, i would provide two rendering copies of mathematical fragments and people would say that is being generated with MathML and that via George CSS techniques. Of course, via some CSS extensions all would be still better. Juan R. Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
Received on Saturday, 10 June 2006 04:25:19 UTC