- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 12:28:01 +0100
White Lynx wrote: > James Graham wrote: >> However, >> elsewhere on this thread you have convinced me that a lot of CSS work is needed >> before it can display maths with any degree of complexity in a pleasant manner >> without requiring extensive, per-formula, adjustments to the style properties >> that would produce a considerable barrier to authoring. > Default style sheet will handle arbitrary deep nesting patterns consistently > withour requiring ad hoc per-formula adjustments. > I was thinking more along the lines of breaking formulae that are wider than the current column width, getting bracket sizes right without hand tweaking, uniform-size matrix cells, embedding of formulae inline, and the various other things that you suggest will not work within CSS. -- "You see stars that clear have been dead for years But the idea just lives on..." -- Bright Eyes
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2006 04:28:01 UTC