- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:07:53 -0700
On Friday 2006-07-21 11:14 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> I gather that a normative reference to the Porter?Duff paper is needed:
> http://keithp.com/~keithp/porterduff/p253-porter.pdf
Perhaps, assuming that's what's been implemented, although that would
only define 10 of the 12 operators in the spec. But that paper doesn't
define binary operators for 'darker' and 'lighter', which seem to be
among the less-interoperable right now. (It defines a unary 'darken'
operator over a space of numeric parameters.)
-David
--
L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20060721/264bcfff/attachment.pgp>
Received on Friday, 21 July 2006 09:07:53 UTC