- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:10:07 +0200
On Jan 27, 2006, at 09:16, Ian Hickson wrote: > In that case I don't understand your proposal. > > We need something that, given this: > > <em><p>X > > ...results in this DOM: > > BODY > EM > P > > ...and given this: > > <em><p>X</em></p> > > ...results in this DOM: > > BODY > EM > P > EM > > Given that "X" can be arbitrarily long, how do you generate the > above DOMs > using your system without sacrificing incremental rendering? > > I understood your system to be: > > [TOKENISER] --> [PREPROCESSOR] --> [PARSER] > > ...where the preprocessor rearranges tokens, and the parser creates > the > DOM. How does your system handle the cases above without blocking > in the > preprocessor stage to wait for the end of X? By producing the second DOM in both cases. Based on Hyatt's comments, I take it that this would make the DOM too heavy and would not work. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:10:07 UTC