- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:33:19 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>
> Why can't it just be defined that noframes and noscript content gets
> parsed exactly as regular markup
Because there are a _lot_ of side-effects of parsing as regular markup.
e.g.
<noframes>
<style>...</style>
<i> Foo
</noframes>
Bar
...the "Bar" musn't be in italics, the <style> block musn't be used, etc.
There's really a LOT of things to catch.
I agree that we may have to address these anyway for XHTML... If we do,
then this might resolve itself for HTML.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 15:33:19 UTC