- From: dolphinling <dolphinling@myrealbox.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 06:06:18 -0500
Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Jan 23, 2006, at 18:43, dolphinling wrote: > >> Second, it could force authoring tools to produce invalid documents >> if the author did not provide any alt text. However, those documents >> would be non-conformant anyway, so this is not a huge problem. > > > It is. Authoring tools are judged by taking a page authored using the > tool and running it through the W3C Validator or, presumably in the > future, through an HTML5 conformance checker. Authoring tool makers who > are capable of making their tool produce syntactically conforming > documents will want to do so and minimize the chance that the users of > their software tarnish the reputation of the tool in the eyes of people > who use an automated test as a litmus test of authoring tool bogosity. > (People who test tools that way will outnumber the people who make a > more profound analysis due to the "validate, validate, validate" > propaganda.) File -> Save "If you save this page as is, it will be non-valid for the following reasons: You did not specify alternate text for one or more images. The page will display properly, but will be less accessible to some users and will fail automated validation tests. [Fix errors] [Save anyway]" ...The point being that that would only be a problem to authoring tools that didn't do something about it--and frankly, I'd expect an authoring tool to give a dialog like that anyway, even if they weren't concerned about market share. -- dolphinling <http://dolphinling.net/>
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 03:06:18 UTC